Skip to content

What does this hold about me?

You will find the answer in the application: Governance Mining → My data. The page reads the real data — it is not a description of what could theoretically be there, it shows your numbers.

It answers the question in three parts, because these are three different kinds of data.

1. In metrics: nothing attributable to you

Section titled “1. In metrics: nothing attributable to you”

Governance Mining’s analyses concern roles, value streams and relationships. A finding such as “this value stream has no owner” names the value stream, not you. There is no row in these metrics that is about you.

2. In approval data: your own drafts and decisions

Section titled “2. In approval data: your own drafts and decisions”

The approval process must know who submitted a change and who decided it — otherwise no change would be traceable. The page shows you three numbers:

  • Drafts you submitted — tied to your user account.
  • Decisions you made — tied to your person, and requires your account to be linked to a person.
  • Changes attributed to you — the changes that landed with your person as submitter.

What does not follow from this: no cycle time for “person X”, no approver ranking, no assessment of your performance. These numbers serve the traceability of decisions — not your appraisal.

If your account is linked to no person, the page says so. Decisions and attributed changes then cannot be associated with you — not even by the platform itself.

3. In person-level analyses: as a rule, nothing at all

Section titled “3. In person-level analyses: as a rule, nothing at all”

Analysis involving personal data is a separately purchased feature. If it is not purchased for your tenant, the page states explicitly: there is no such analysis in which you could appear. If it is purchased, you see here in full what it holds about you.

  • The processing description under Scope of analysis shows you what runs in your tenant at all, with which thresholds and retention periods — and what explicitly is not analysed.
  • A request for access, rectification or erasure under Art. 15 ff. GDPR goes to your employer: they are the controller, roleALPHA is the processor. This page gives you the basis to phrase that request concretely.

Related: Governance Mining · Governance Mining — what is analysed and what is not